
THE EXTRAORDINARY VARIETY OF LIFE
Life can be found just about everywhere on Earth, whether it's visible
or not. Almost no place is without life forms of some kind. A vast number
of species live in all habitats, in close harmony with both those environments
and with one another. From a drop of sea water to the boundless oceans,
from a handful of soil to whole continents, from ice caps to thermal
springs, from many meters below the ground to the air you breathe, from
deep within our bodies to your own skin...
In addition, the Earth plays host to living things with very different
body structures, internal systems, forms of behavior and characteristics:
From a bacterium just 1 millionth of a meter in size to a giant sequoia
tree some 100 meters (328 feet) high and 2,500 tons (5,512,000 pounds)
in weight; from deep-rooted trees to terns that fly 20,000 kilometers
(12,430 miles) on their migrations or salmon that swim for thousands;
from a mayfly with a life span of just a few hours to the creosote bush
that can live for more than 1,000 years; from the grouper fish that travel
singly through the oceans to ants that live in colonies of several millions;
from a delicate orchid to insects that are impervious even to radiation...
As Dr. G. David Tilman, Professor of Ecology from
University of Minnesota puts it, "The most striking feature of Earth is the existence of life,
and the most striking feature of life is its diversity."2
To describe the variety and richness of life on our
plant, scientists use a special term: Biodiversity. This term was adopted
from biological diversity and includes animals, plants, fungi and micro-organisms—in
short, all living things.
The term biodiversity is now widely employed, but contrary to what is
often imagined, it has only recently become a familiar term. No matter
how far back in history one researches the variety of life, the special
term of biodiversity entered scientific circles only in 1986. That year,
the concept was born at the Biodiversity Symposium held by the American
National Academy of Sciences and the Smithsonian Institution.3
Following that, there was a rapid increase in initiatives
drawing attention to the importance of biological diversity and the need
to protect it. Following the United Nations Conference on the Environment
and Regeneration, held in Rio de Janeiro in June 1992, biodiversity became
one of the subjects of joint concern for all the countries of the world.
How Many Species Are There on Earth?
In biology, the concept of species is used to describe,
understand and reduce biodiversity to a specific number. A living species
consists of a population whose members can reproduce only among themselves
and that share similar structural and functional characteristics. (This
concept will be explored further in Chapter 3, "Evolution's Speciation Dilemma.")
How many species are there on Earth? That question has long intrigued
a great many people. Wide-ranging research is now being carried out to
answer it. To date, scientific studies have revealed that no definite
figure can be given, only that it is exceedingly large.
The eminent zoologist Edward O. Wilson, one of the scientists who first
came up with the concept of biodiversity, is regarded as an authority
in the field.4 A professor at Harvard University, he offers the following
analysis:
No one knows the number of species of living organisms, but there are
probably at least 5 million, and the number could be as high as 100 million.
Consider first the question of the amount of biodiversity. The number
of species of organisms on Earth is unknown to the nearest order of magnitude.
About 1.5 million species have been given names to date, but the actual
number is likely to lie somewhere between 10 and 100 million.5
Thomas E. Lovejoy is President of the H. John Heinz III Center for Science,
Economics and the Environment and an expert on biodiversity:
While the number of species currently described is on the order of 1.4
million, the big question is how many species are there totally? Current
estimates of the total number of species run from 10-100 million.6
In a paper, Professor Quentin Wheeler of Natural History Museum, London
and Professor Joel Cracraft of the American Museum of Natural History
submitted their own estimate of biodiversity:
Despite having accumulated significant knowledge about the world's species
over the past 2 centuries, we still cannot provide accurate answers to
the simplest of all questions about biodiversity. How many species are
there? Estimates vary from 3 to 100 million species.7
Taylor Ricketts of Stanford University says that: "The Earth is home
to over 1.7 million known species, and probably 10 times that number
have yet to be discovered."8
Alessandro Minelli from the University of Padua states
that "Global
estimates of existing biodiversity are thus quite uncertain. Figures
ranging from 5 to 130 million species have been recently offered for
the gross total."9
According to The Encarta Encyclopedia, the identified and
named species number 1.75 million, and some scientists estimate the total
number of species on Earth to be around 10 million and others, more than
100 million.10 According to the Encyclopedia Britannica, many more species
are waiting to be identified and named, and there are currently estimated
to be between 10 and 30 million living species.11
Also, these estimates are for species currently living and
do not include those that have become extinct.
The Scale of Biodiversity

And in your creation and all the creatures He has spread about there are Signs for people with certainty.
(Surat al-Jathiyya, 4) |
To provide an idea of the impressive richness of micro-organism, fungi,
plant and animal species on Earth, a few examples can be cited. According
to Professor Wilson's calculation, a catalogue describing merely a million
species would fill a 60-meter library shelf.12
To view biodiversity from another angle, let us now include species'
genetic richness in the calculation. The information controlling the
body's functions, encoded in the human DNA molecule in the nucleus of
every cell, would fill an encyclopedia containing a million pages. Bear
in mind that Man is only one of 10 million species, and a truly extraordinary
picture emerges: Were we to write down all the genetic information for
all those species, there would not be enough paper in the world to do
so.
Enough information that controls the body's functions has been coded in the cell nucleus of every human being to fill a 1-million-page encyclopedia. Bearing in mind that man is just one species among tens of millions, a truly extraordinary picture emerges. |
The number of single-celled eukaryotes (Protista),
algae, bacteria, fungi, seaweeds, flowering plants, sponges, corals,
insects, birds, reptiles, fish and mammals—in short, the number of the categories of all
living things—is so huge that some scientists and researchers think
that the target of determining and describing all species is unattainable.13
Two researchers from London's Imperial College, Andy
Purvis and Andy Hector, published an article in Nature magazine titled "Getting the Measure
of Biodiversity." They emphasized the point that computer databases and
internet technology have prepared far more comprehensive species lists
than ever before; and that trillions of bytes of information have been
collected together in data banks. However, all this information is no
more than "a small drop in the ocean," as Purvis and Hector put it.14
There are hundreds of breeds of dog, all with different appearances, weights, colors, forms of behavior and characteristics. Yet they are all still the same species. |
But the really impressive thing is not just the total number and diversity
of species. Within each species, there are also a large number of variations.
For instance, all dogs belong to the single species of Canis familiaris.
But in addition, there are hundreds of diverse breeds with different
appearances, sizes, body structures, colors, and forms of behavior.
Another phenomenon is that some animal species exhibit different body
structures at different periods in their lives. During its pupa, larva
and adult stages for example, a butterfly or moth exhibits an enormous
variety in terms of structure, size, color, life style, behavior and
biological systems.
Anyone realizing the wealth of biodiversity on Earth needs to ask an
important question: How did such a variety of life emerge?
|
Described of Species Number |
Number of Species Estimated
|
Bacteria |
4.000 |
1.000.000 |
Fungi |
75.000 |
1.000.000 |
Eukaryotic single-celled organisms |
40.000 |
300.000 |
Algae seaweeds |
45.000 |
400.000 |
Land plants |
270.000 |
300.000 |
Round worms |
25.000 |
500.000 |
Crustaceans |
45.000 |
150.000 |
Arachnids |
80.000 |
750.000 |
Insects |
1.000.000 |
10.000.000 |
Mollusks |
100.000 |
200.000 |
Chordates |
50.000 |
55.000 |
Others |
130.000 |
300.000 |
Total (approximately) |
1.900.000 |
15.000.000 |
|
|
|
This question has always given evolutionists a major headache, and will
always continue to do so. Writing a so-called evolutionary scenario for
even a single species is a major problem for Darwinism, and the evolution
of millions of species is an irresolvable one. People who set aside preconceptions
on the other hand, clearly understand that all living species came into
being by the wish and creation of God, Lord of the worlds. This is the
sole explanation for the magnificent diversity of species, and looking
for any other is a waste of time.
No matter how much large, attractive animals like birds, reptiles and
mammals attract notice, insects are actually the group with the greatest
diversity. According to contemporary findings, insects represent over
two-thirds of the total number of species on Earth.15 Approximately 1
million species belonging to this group have been named and described
so far.16
As research deepens, brand- new scientific discoveries are made, and
new plants, animals, insects and marine life forms are discovered every
year. Every new study sheds light on one unknown aspect of the world's
wealth of variety. Therefore, the numbers and proportions in the above
table will change over time.
The distribution of Earth's biodiversity is not fully known. One fact
observed so far is a general increase in the number of species as one
descends from the poles towards the equator. Nothing more definite can
be said, mainly because countless ecosystems, on both land and in the
sea, are still waiting to be studied. Many regions on Earth have still
not been comprehensively examined.

Terrestrial biodiversity is found in only 1.4% of the planet's land mass. Locales that are rich in such diversity are at the same time home to rapidly growing human societies. |
Places particularly rich in terms of species are known as
hot spots, and found generally in tropical regions and islands. The organization
called Conservation International has stated that while land-dwelling
life forms comprise only 1.4% of life on Earth, some 25 hot spots contain
roughly half of all land-dwelling species.17
Researches in the World of Science

Carl Linnaeus |
In the 250 years since the publication of Systema
Naturae, a book by Carl Linnaeus, who is one of the most eminent names
in the history of science, some 1.75 million species have been named
and described—again,
only a very small part of the world's total number of species. But these
species named by researchers have not yet been collected under a single
scientific index. As yet, there is no list containing all the known animals,
plants, fungi and micro-organisms.18
This state of affairs can be compared to a library with nearly 2 million
books, but no ordered index that lists them all.
The lack of a catalog including all species naturally gives rise to
some confusion. In order to eliminate this, many scientists are trying
to collect the names of all known species under a comprehensive index.
For example, the Species 2000 program is one such study, intended to
catalog all known species.19 By the end of 2001, this project, had listed
some 250,000 species, and existing global species databases may presently
account for some 40% of the total known species.20
Other studies are being carried out to identify as yet unknown species.
Thousands of scientists from many countries, particularly the USA, are
now researching the species on Earth. The total budget set aside for
this endeavor is hundreds of millions of dollars. Many institutions whose
objective is to discover and understand diversity are active today.
Within the framework of this research, 2001 and 2002 were declared to
be International Biodiversity Observation Years, and a special study
to which eminent biologists, environmentalists and experts are participating
was initiated in order to obtain more information about species throughout
the world.21 This research is regarded as one of the most important developments
in 21st century science. Diana Wall, a professor at Colorado State University
and Director of the International Biodiversity Observation Year Management
Board, summarizes the importance of this research:
Scientists have described about 1.75 million species,
but we estimate that there are over 12 million species still to be
described. For 99% of species we simply don't have good information
on their distribution, abundance, whether they are plentiful or endangered,
or their role in providing goods and services that we get from ecosystems,
such as renewal of soil fertility, decomposition of waste and purification
of water…
Research into biodiversity will be of great benefit in many fields, from discovering new genetic compounds and chemical substances to be used in drugs to crop improvement and the cleanup of polluted regions. |
Exploring biodiversity will unlock many benefits, through discovery
of new genes and chemicals that can be used for drugs, to improve crops,
or to restore polluted land. Perhaps even more importantly, learning
where species are, their role in maintaining healthy ecosystems, and
how we can conserve them will be vital for making more informed decisions
about our land, rivers and oceans.22
A new study initiated in this field is the All Species project.23 Eminent
biodiversity experts such as Edward Wilson and Peter Raven are involved
in this project, whose aim is to name and describe all species, and to
prepare an Internet page for each one. This project is far more complex
than other studies being carried out in the world of science, and a much
wider-ranging one than the Human Genome project, as was made clear in
the 26 October 2001 issue of Science magazine. According to All Species
Project researchers' estimates, it will cost some $20 billion to establish
a data bank of all species.24 This cost alone is enough to give an idea
of the project's size.
It therefore seems certain that increasing research will
permit us to discover previously unknown species. Every organism newly
discovered, from smallest to the largest, once again shows thinking and
rational people the sublime nature of their own creation.
The Latest Situation

He cast firmly embedded mountains of the Earth so it would not move under you, and rivers and pathways so that hopefully you would be guided.
(Surat an-Nahl, 15) |
How much do we know about the variety of life on Earth as a result of
high-budget and wide-ranging studies in the early 21st century?
Important answers to these questions will once again reveal that biodiversity
is an incomparable marvel of creation.
Scientists all agree that we still have a long way
to go. As Professor Wilson has put it, "only a tiny fraction of biodiversity on Earth has
been explored."25 Professor Peter Raven, director of the Missouri Botanical
Garden, emphasizes that, "the task is one of enormous importance."26
Remember, some 1.75 million known species have yet
to be set out and classified according to scientific criteria. As stated
by Professor Minelli, "There
are serious problems, indeed, even with that part of biological diversity
that has been already described and named."27 Another researcher, John
Alroy of California University, says that in all likelihood, one-fifth
of all species names in the scientific literature are invalid.28
According to World Resources Institute experts, we know more about the
numbers of stars in space than those of the species on Earth.29 Norman
Myers, an eminent Oxford university environmentalist, expresses this
in another way:
While biodiversity, and indeed life itself, is the key characteristic
of our planet, we know more about the total numbers of atoms in the universe
than about Earth's complement of species.30
Another scientist to express this is Nigel E. Stork, Director of the
James Cook University Tropical Rain Forest Ecology and Management Research
Centre. Professor Stork says that the data regarding biodiversity are
highly deficient:
In recent years biologists have come to recognize just how little we
know about the organisms with which we share the planet Earth. In particular,
attempts to determine how many species there are in total have been surprisingly
fruitless... What these arguments show is how little we actually know
about some of the fundamental aspects of the biology and distribution
of organisms. We cannot say how widespread species are, we do not know
the size of the species pool, and we do not know how specific species
are to a particular habitat, type of soil, type of forest, or, in some
cases, a species of tree. 31
To summarize, the distribution, densities, positions in their habitats
and levels of genetic variety of most named species are not yet known
for certain.32 Furthermore, the great majority of existing species have
not yet been described. Despite all our efforts, we know only a very
small part of the magnificent variety of life on Earth.
As you shall see in the chapters that follow, this magnificent richness
of species definitively refutes the theory of evolution, which claims
that living things came into being as the result of chance, and proves
one single fact in a way that permits no doubt: Creation.
The glorious richness of life on Earth is the result of a very special
creation that belongs only to God, the Almighty and Omniscient. His creation
of all things is revealed in various verses:
Among His Signs is the creation of the heavens and Earth and all the
creatures He has spread about in them... (Surat ash-Shura, 29)
... He has no partner in the Kingdom. He created everything and determined
it most exactly. (Surat al-Furqan, 2)
Ecosystems and Biodiversity
Living things exist in complete harmony with each other and with their surroundings. With the disappearance of a single species, the whole ecosystem is disrupted and balance is damaged. |
A specific area's ecosystem includes all the living
things in it, as well as their physical surroundings. Lakes, forests,
and coral reefs, together with the living things they harbor, are all
examples of ecosystems. Lake Baikal in Siberia, for instance, is an ecosystem
containing 1,500 plant and animal species.33
Each ecosystem has its own unique variety of life. For example, there
are dozens of species of trees in a typical North American forest, and
hundreds in a South American rain forest.
The point to be emphasized is that any balanced, healthy
ecosystem hosts a wide spectrum of living species. A large number of
species are linked to one another within a very complex interconnected
system, and these play a greater or smaller part in the balanced functioning
of the ecosystem as a whole—so much so that sometimes, the absence
of a single species can impair an entire system and damage its equilibrium.
For example, in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, otters in the
Northwest American and Western Canadian coasts were hunted almost to
the point of extinction. The otters fed on sea urchins, and when these
mammals practically disappeared, sea urchins multiplied rapidly and
began damaging seaweed beds. Damage to the seaweed had a harmful effect
on several species of fish and invertebrates in those same waters and
led to a decline in their numbers.
Toward the end of the 20th century, when otters were made a protected
species, the seaweed began increasing, and balance in the region was
re-established.34
Many more similar cases have been observed, helping us to understand
that species spend their lives in perfect harmony with each other and
with their surroundings.
But the term extraordinarily complex utterly fails to do justice to
the complexity of the system constituted by the glorious variety of life
on Earth. To obtain a closer understanding of this, consider the following:
Even if all scientists work together, combining all our accumulated technological
and scientific knowledge and material means, not even the smallest imitation
of one of these systems can be produced. Professor Wilson says that it
is totally impossible for scientists to collect species beforehand from
a rain forest about to be cut down and to introduce them all somewhere
else:
The biologists cannot accomplish this task, not if thousands of them
came with a billion-dollar budget. They cannot even imagine how to do
it. In the forest patch live legions of species: perhaps 300 birds, 500
butterflies, 200 ants, 50,000 beetles, 1,000 trees, 5,000 fungi, tens
of thousands of bacteria and so on down a long roster of major groups.
Each species occupies a precise niche, demanding a certain place, an
exact microclimate, particular nutrients and temperature and humidity
cycles with specified timing to trigger phases of the life cycle. Many,
perhaps most, of the species are locked in symbioses with other species;
they cannot survive and reproduce unless arrayed with their partners
in the correct idiosyncratic configurations.
Even if the biologists pulled off the taxonomic equivalent of the Manhattan
Project, sorting and preserving cultures of all the species, they could
not then put the community back together again. It would be like unscrambling
an egg with a pair of spoons. 35
From Professor Wilson's statements, you can see that no ecosystem can
ever be established using human intelligence and knowledge. Therefore,
it is totally impossible for ecosystems to come into being through blind
chance, as evolutionists maintain. The following statement by the well-known
Professor of Botany Karl Niklas from Cornell University is significant:
I don't think that the ecological patterns that we see surfacing in
fossils and living organisms and across the continents are a consequence
of chance.36
Ecosystems operating in perfect harmony are no doubt manifest proofs
of the fact of Creation and the existence of a sublime Creator. At the
same time, the Earth's biodiversity and flawless order completely refute
Darwinism, which claims that they formed as the result of blind chance
and random coincidences.
Let's have a closer look at the fact of Creation in certain
ecosystems with a wealth of biodiversity.
Lessons to be Learned From the Biosphere 2 Project
Our own lives depend indisputably on millions of other living species,
flawless balances and perfectly functioning ecosystems. The purification
of the water you drink, the production of the air you breathe and the
food you eat, the fertilization of agricultural land, the production
of raw materials in the objects you use and countless other activities
are all carried out by living things. Most people fail to properly appreciate
these blessings they obtain from living things that live side by side
with them, and most do'nt even feel the need to think about them. Yet
to free one from lazy thinking and familiarity, what would happen if
the living things that perform these services for us ceased to exist?
Clearly, we, too, would be unable to survive. Even if we mobilized advanced
technology and our entire material means, we could never establish the
balances and conditions essential to our survival. The latest scientific
research to confirm this fact was the Biosphere 2 Project, regarded as
the largest and most complex closed study area used in ecological research
to date.
This project aimed to establish an ecosystem that
would provide a habitat for eight people, plants and animals for a
two-year period in a closed area of 13,000 square meters (15,550 square
yards) in size.37 The system contained "rooms" resembling such natural
ecosystems as agricultural areas, forests and seas. However, the project
was a failure, which disappointed a great many scientists. Joel Cohen
of Rockefeller University and David Tilman of Minnesota University
described the result of this initiative in an article in Science magazine:
Despite the enormous resources invested in the original design and construction
(estimated at roughly $200 million from 1984 to 1991), and despite a
multimillion-dollar operating budget, it proved impossible to create
a materially closed system that could support eight human beings with
adequate food, water, and air for 2 years. The management of Biosphere
2 encountered numerous unexpected problems and surprises, even though
almost unlimited energy and technology were available to support Biosphere
2 from the outside. 38
Despite Biosphere 2's unique design and the impressive resources employed in its construction, it was impossible for its closed system to recreate the balances that have been operating flawlessly on Earth for millions of years. Therefore, it was not possible to produce a self-sustaining environment habitable by human beings, plants and animals. |
Some of the unexpected problems that emerged in the facility between
1991 and 1993 and made life impossible included a drop in oxygen levels
to 14%, sudden rises in the carbon dioxide concentration, a rise in the
amount of nitric oxide sufficient to cause brain damage, the disappearance
of most of the living species (including 19 of 25 vertebrate species
and all pollinators brought into the enclosure, which would have ensured
the eventual extinction of most of the plant species as well), water
pollution, excessive algae, and population explosion of crazy ants, cockroaches
and katydids.39
In short, despite all the efforts made, it proved impossible to produce
in the closed Biosphere 2 system the balances that have been operating
for millions of years on Earth, and thus it was impossible to establish
an environment habitable for humans, animals and plants.
In conclusion, Professor Cohen and Professor Tilman summarized the lesson
to be learned from the project:
No one yet knows how to engineer systems that provide humans
with the life supporting services that natural ecosystems produce for
free.40
The Rain Forests
Whenever tropical rain forests are mentioned, the first things that
come to mind are dazzling butterflies, unusual-looking insects, and large,
broad-leaved, trees. Rain forests are found in regions close to the equator
and consist of dense trees that are always green and very tall. These
forests' most important feature is the extraordinary number of plant
and animal species they contain. A tropical rain forest, millions of
square kilometers in size, is home to a wide variety of species.
Around 250 years ago, the first European researchers to set foot in
the rain forests of South America were astonished by the variety of life
they encountered. Each new study again revealed the diversity of plant
and animal species.
A rain forest in the tropical belt has very different characteristics
from those of other forests. For one thing, underneath the very tall
trees 50 meters (164 feet) high, there are medium-sized ones, such as
palm, cedar, mahogany and figs. The trunks and branches of these are
covered in bright orchids, cacti, ferns and mosses. The lowest layer
in the forest, the grass layer, consists of a dense vegetation covering
and hosts a great variety of insect, bacteria and fungi species. In short,
a rain forest's most characteristic feature is the variety of life that
so amazes us.

A rain forest’s most
characteristic feature is the astonishing variety of life it contains.
One hectare (10,000 square meters, or 11,960 square yards) of tropical
rain forest may contain more than 600 different species of trees.
In a single day, 440 species of butterflies can be collected in
one region of the Amazon Basin. Forty-three separate species of
ant and 650 different insect species can be found living on a single
tree. |
Rain forests comprise just 7% of the land surface,
yet contain more than 50% of the plant and animal species on Earth.
Researchers also state that this last percentage may change as we learn
more about biodiversity. The well-known Smithsonian Institute researcher
Thomas Lovejoy makes a very apposite statement: "The larger point is that the more people
look at the tropical forest in different ways, as Terry Erwin has done,
the more biodiversity there seems to be."41
The micro-organisms, tiny insects, bacteria, fungi, leaf-cutter and other species of ant that live on the rain forest floor are responsible for cleaning the forest and keeping it fertile. |
So
that you can envision the diversity in question. One hectare (10,000
square meters, or 11,960 square yards) of tropical rain forest can contain
more than 600 different species of trees.42 In
one region of the Amazon Basin, 440 species of butterfly can be collected
in a single day.43 Forty-three
separate species of ants 44 and 650 different species of insect can be
found on a single tree.45 In this same region, one can also encounter
hundreds of species of bird in a 1-kilometer (1,094-yard) area of forest.
Taking ten species of tree in Borneo as an example, there are more than
2,800 different arthropods on them.46 The number of insect species living
in tropical forests is estimated to be in the millions.47
These numbers do not represent the total number of living
organisms in a particular habitat, just the number of species. Another
astonishing fact is that in tropical rain forests, according to some
experts, millions or even tens of millions of living things live in complete
harmony and co-operation.
Soil in tropical rain forests is generally thought of as being rich
and fertile. Recently, however, it has been realized that this is not
so. In terms of nutrients, the soil is poor, compared to that of other
forests.48 How did such a great variety of plants emerge from poor soil?
The answer lies in the perfection of the rain forest ecosystem.
The biodiversity in tropical forests has been created as a whole, and
is based on very delicate, complementary balances. For instance, consider
the micro-organisms, minute insects and fungi living on the forest floor.
Their dimensions are very small in comparison to the trees and animals,
yet they are responsible for cleaning the forest and making the soil
productive. They break down dead animals and leaves and branches that
fall from the trees, recycling them back into the ecosystem. In this
way, nothing is wasted. Professor Wilson describes the importance of
this mechanism:
The leafcutters and other kinds of ants, together with bacteria, fungi,
termites and mites, process most of the dead vegetation and return its
nutrients to the plants to keep the great tropical forests alive. 49
We still do not know how many millions of species
live in tropical rain forests, but we do know that every species has
a different task and importance in these ecosystems, and that these
species live together in harmony. This is expressed in an article about
Amazon rain forests in the Turkish magazine Bilim ve Teknik ("Science and Technique"):
The continuity of species in this Amazon Basin's complex ecosystem is
based on their close dependence on one another. Every species, be it
plant or animal, contributes to part of this system with its millions
of components. Trees, the epiphytes on trees, fungi, monkeys, vampire
bats, eagles, parrots, the crocodiles, piranha fish and lilies in the
river, and micro-organisms invisible to the naked eye all make different
contributions to the giant ecosystem in which they live. There are very
delicate balances here. The rain forest exists together with all these
species. The disappearance of a single species will damage several of
these balances. 50
Indeed, such great harmony and interdependence exist among some species
in the forest that one cannot survive in the absence of the other. Some
90% of the trees in the rain forest need animals to spread their seeds,51 while insect larvae, caterpillars, birds and other animals feed on the
seeds of these trees. For example, species of fig tree and fig fly species
are so interdependent that either cannot survive in isolation from the
other. In the absence of fig flies, fig trees cannot fertilize themselves,
and in the absence of fig trees, fig flies are deprived of their natural
habitat. There is a different species of fig fly for every one of the
more than 900 species of fig tree in tropical regions!52
Traits such as the fig fly's body and mouth structure and the flower's
structure and reproductive organs, as well as the insect's flights and
the times when the flowers open are in complete harmony. Accounting for
this utter dependence between species has always been difficult for Darwinism.
For this phenomenon, there is only one explanation: The harmony between
plants and animals is a marvel of Creation. There is no chance of this
system developing over time through small random changes and the mindless
mechanisms of evolution.
Take, for example, the harmonious existence of the hawk moth Xanthopan
morganii and one species of Madagascar orchid. To collect nectar, this
moth extends its proboscis, some 30 to 35 centimeters (11 to 13 inches)
in length, around 30 centimeters (11 inches) deep into the body of the
orchid, and thus enables it to be fertilized.53 In order to reach and
fertilize the ovary at this depth, the moth needs a proboscis of just
such a length, In other words, the two species must be totally compatible
with one another.
Say: "Have
you thought about your partner gods, those you call upon besides
God? Show me what they have created of the Earth; or do they have
a partnership in the heavens?" Have We given them a Book whose
Clear Signs they follow? No indeed! The wrongdoers promise each
other nothing but delusion.
(Surah Fatir, 40)
Tropical rainforests are often called "the lungs of the world" because
during photosynthesis, their countless plants absorb carbon dioxide
and release oxygen.
|
This represents a major dilemma for evolutionists, because it is impossible
for these two different species to have undergone a parallel process
of evolution, much less at the same time.
Let us assume that the ancestors of the Madagascar orchid and the Xanthopan
morganii moth had had, respectively, much shorter nectary and a much
shorter proboscis. (This is the assumption that must be made, according
to the theory of evolution.) In that case, both species would have extended
their parts simultaneously. The hawk moth and the orchid, would each
have been exposed to mutations that simultaneously extended the length
of their proboscis and nectary. Of course, such mutations would have
had only advantageous effects on these two life forms (and beneficial
mutations have never been observed). They would have to out-multiply
other members of their species that had not undergone mutation, and this
supposed process of natural selection would have to continue completely
by chance, but without error, for millions of years.
To believe that is like believing that a lock and the key that opens
it each came to be independently, but in a manner totally compatible
with each other. Yet clearly, reason requires us to accept that two structures
completely compatible with one another are both examples of simultaneous
creation. To put it another way, reason requires us to accept that the
orchid and the moth were created in harmony with each other.
Another example of the flawless harmony among tropical life forms can
be seen in those regions known as flood forests, found along the shores
of the Amazon and its tributaries. When the rain is heaviest, they are
flooded, and during this period, a marvelous phenomenon takes place.
Fish come to eat the fruits that fall into the water and distribute the
seeds of those fruits of several species of tree.
Clearly, the variety of species in the rain forests
are of great importance to the native peoples living there. But what
importance can they have for the billions of humans who do not live
in such regions? Scientists have provided the answer: The plants and
animals in these tropical forests are of vital importance to every
human on Earth. They are described as "the
Earth's lungs" because of the way they absorb carbon dioxide from the
atmosphere during photosynthesis and give off oxygen. Rain forests play
a major role in the circulation of carbon and oxygen in the atmosphere,
the global climate system, water circulation on Earth, and in many other
natural balances. In addition, they represent a splendid source of new
foods, products and medicines.
The magnificent variety of life in the rain forests is a major headache
for Darwinism. The situation does not even permit evolutionists to offer
any of their tall tales. Indeed, evolutionist researchers admit that
they do not know the reason for the tropical rain forests' glorious biodiversity.54 Yet very evidently, God has created the single-celled organisms, plant
and animal species in these forests, just as He has created all living
things. If evolutionists wish to find a way out of the dead end they
find themselves in, they must accept this fact.
To grasp just how irrational the evolutionist claim
is, imagine a large factory that manufactures dozens of different products—a
wide range of technological devices such as televisions and computers.
Now, could these various products all have been invented by chance,
with no conscious intervention? Could these devices, products of advanced
technology, gradually form through the effects of such natural phenomena
as the sunlight, wind, and lightning?
Such an event is of course impossible; both a factory and
the devices it manufactures result from the design and planning by engineers
and various other experts. Now consider the rain forests, home to tens
of millions of different species, all with systems far more complex than
those in any electronic devices available today. Such an environment,
consisting of life forms that have lived together in harmony and co-operation
for millions of years, could not come into being spontaneously, right
down to the very finest detail, as evolutionists claim. The sublime intelligence
here belongs to God, the Lord of the worlds.
Coral Reefs
Coral reefs come about gradually as dead corals, algae and crustaceans
accumulate in different layers. They are found in tropical seas and can
spread over rather large areas. In addition to their wealth of color
and form, coral reefs harbor a variety of life, comparable to that in
the rain forests. Many marine creatures, from planktons too small to
be seen with the naked eye to sharks up to 6 meters (19 feet) long inhabit
coral reefs.
Tens of thousands of widely different species live on coral reefs: Spotted,
striped, brightly colored fish with striking patterns, fish that live
in colonies, bright-hued corals, crustaceans with different appearances,
eye-catching sea plants, sponges unique to coral reefs, mussels, oysters,
sea urchins, crabs, starfish, micro-organisms, invertebrates...
At 2,000 kilometers (1,243 miles) long, Australia's Great Barrier Reef
is the world's largest structure composed of living organisms. It plays
host to 2,000 different species of fish, 350 species of coral, and 4,000
species of mollusks.55 But these are only the numbers of species identified
to date. New species of animal and single-celled organisms are discovered
every year.
According to Marjorie Reaka-Kudla, Professor of Zoology at Maryland
University, the calculated number of described species on coral reefs
is 93,000, and the estimated number should be about 600,000- 950,000
species.56

According to Marjorie Reaka Kudla, Professor of Zoology at Maryland
University, the number of described species in the world’s coral
reefs is 93,000, and the estimated number should be about 950,000.
It is Almighty God Who creates every one of these life forms
together with their perfect systems. |
In the same way as rain forests, coral reefs are full of living things
created in such a way as to complement one another and meet each other's
needs. For example, coral polyps live shared or symbiotic lives with
single-celled algae (zooxanthellae) inside their tissues and green algae
on their outer surfaces. Coral polyps take some of the nutrients produced
by algae through photosynthesis. Algae, on the other hand, obtain the
nutrients they need from the coral polyps. At the same time, the polyps
provide a safe place for the algae to live.
Coral reefs are generally found in waters classified
as being poor in terms of nutrients.57 The question of how the reefs
managed to grow in such waters has long been of great interest.58 According
to the latest research, one reason for the wealth of species on the
reefs is that these animals work together in harmony and co-operation.
One study published in the 18 October, 2001 edition of Nature magazine,
revealed the importance of the species of sponges, mussels and ringworms
living in the cavities in the reefs. By filtering vegetable plankton,
these organisms, most of which are very small, secrete substances such
as ammonia and phosphate, needed by coral animals.59 In short, the
system—consisting of thousands
of small living species living in cavities in the reefs—serves
like an enormous filtering station.
We obtain some real benefits from the micro-organisms, plants and animals
in the ecosystem: Corals secrete the calcium they absorb from the sea
in the form of calcium carbonate. Working like a sophisticated chemical
laboratory, they play an important role in regulating carbon dioxide
balances, in both the ocean and the atmosphere. The fish, mussels and
other living organisms in the coral reefs represent food sources for
hundreds of millions of people. Since coral reefs generally form close
to the surface, they protect shorelines from the damaging effects of
large waves, thus preventing erosion and reducing the harm done by storms.
Thanks to coral reefs, the water between the shore and the reef is more
tranquil in comparison to the open sea, constituting a habitat more suitable
for fish and crustaceans.

Porcupine fish protect themselves by distending their stomachs like
balloons and erecting the spines on their skin. |
In addition, the wealth of genetic material from the wide variety of
life on coral reefs is used in medical research and in the development
of new drugs. Douglas Chadwick, a biologist and writer for National Geographic
magazine, expresses some of these benefits we enjoy from the coral reefs:
Humanity's ties to the creatures living around coral reefs may multiply
as medical research taps more of the organisms at home there. Some have
already yielded compounds active against inflammations, asthma, heart
disease, leukemia, tumors, bacterial and fungal infections, and viruses,
including HIV. Studies found that chemicals used by sea slugs and certain
sponges to repel fish also work on land as insecticides. Screening the
venom of tropical cone snails for pharmaceutical properties turned up
a possible nonaddictive substitute for morphine. Sea whips, related to
true corals, offer a potential painkillers as well, while coral skeletons
themselves are being investigated as substrate for bone grafts. 60
Each of the species living on coral reefs has been equipped with extraordinary
systems and characteristics. For instance, some fish and other creatures
have more color receptors than human beings, and therefore perceive colors
better than we do.61 Most coral reef fish are able to change their colors
to a certain extent, and some species can do so as quickly as a chameleon.62 The large-eyed sea bass and squirrel fish are able to hunt at night,
or at depths where no daylight penetrates, thanks to their sensitive
eyes. Puffer fish defend themselves by inflating their stomachs like
a balloon and erecting their spines.63 Parrot fish camouflage themselves
at night by covering themselves with a gelatinous sheath; they feed on
algae by breaking off pieces of coral with their powerful, beak-like
mouths.64 Scavenger fish and cleaner shrimp live off parasites on the
fishes' skin. These, of course, are only a few of the perfect systems
and flawless cooperations found among life forms on the reef.

Parrot fish camouflage themselves at night by encasing their entire
bodies with a gelatinous substance. |
Some reef-living fish species are able to camouflage themselves very
well, thanks to their colors that closely match those of their surroundings.
Species such as angel fish and butterfly fish possess very striking colors.
Since they can easily be detected by predators, one would expect them
to soon become extinct. But these fish survive despite their striking
colors thanks to their own particular methods of defense. Evolutionists
are unable to account for this state of affairs, which is the exact opposite
of Darwinist expectations.
One evolutionist researcher studying this is the marine
biologist Justin Marshall of Queensland University. In an article, "Why Are Reef Fish
So Colorful?" in Scientific American magazine, Dr. Marshall describes
this mystery "as tantalizing as it is beautiful."65
In fact, there is no mystery here at all, nor anything
disappointing, only history being repeated. Darwin himself described
as "trifling particulars
of structure [that] often make me very uncomfortable. The sight of a
feather in a peacock's tail, whenever I gaze at it, makes me sick!"66 These same difficulties are also faced by his followers. In short, the
variety of life on the reefs, animals with incomparable features and
the prefect harmony among species represents a nightmare for Darwinists.
To wake up from that nightmare, they need to admit that God created the
reef fish with their stunning colors and appearances.
People who keep marine aquariums as a hobby know how very difficult
it is to feed tropical reef fish and corals. The main reason is the need
to constantly replicate these creatures' reef habitats. In a marine aquarium,
the salinity, temperature, pH level, light, oxygen level and chemical
combinations in the water need to be kept in balance. Such corals and
fish in are prone to be affected by even small changes in their aquarium
environments. The organisms will die unless the ideal conditions are
maintained and constantly regulated by technological equipment.
Now, bearing in mind the difficulty of running a marine
aquarium containing just a few species of coral and fish: Could the
tens of thousands of species living on the coral reefs have come into
being spontaneously, or by chance? Could their striking colors, impressive
hunting and defense systems, unique body structures, sense organs,
systems and genetic information be the work of coincidence? Could the
reef environment—in which
the plants, animals, plankton and micro-organisms have lived in harmony
and order for millions of years—have come about without a superior
and conscious intervention?
Of course these events are impossible. Anyone able to reason
can see their illogicality. Reef creatures with their amazing characteristics
demonstrate the sublimity and glory of their Creation; they reveal the
infinite artistry and omniscience of God, their Creator.
Deep-Sea Creatures
While walking along the seashore, you must have noticed seaweed and
various sea plants.. These and some microscopic planktons produce their
own nourishment by way of photosynthesis. This represents the first step
in the marine food chain. However, sunlight cannot penetrate deeper than
100 meters (328 feet) in sea water, and the deepest ocean depth is 11,000
meters (36,090 feet) beneath the surface, with an average depth of 5,000
meters (16,400 feet). There is no possibility of photosynthesis taking
place there, under conditions of high pressure per square inch, a low
temperature in the region of 2 to -4 degrees Celsius (35 to 39 degrees
Fahrenheit), and constant darkness. The only food sources consist of
waste products and organic substances raining down from higher up. In
short, the environment is completely different from what humans are familiar
with. Despite all these inhospitable conditions, however, various fish
and very different invertebrate creatures and micro-organisms still thrive
in the ocean depths.
Temperature, pressure, the density of foodstuffs and light levels vary
according to the further down from the surface one descends. Yet living
things with structures and systems suited to their environment are found
at all depths. Down there are fish, mussels, sea lilies, sponges, crustaceans,
shrimps, crabs, arthropods, octopuses, ink fish, worms with spiny bodies,
starfish, sea urchins, jellyfish, lobsters, single-celled organisms and
organisms whose names can be encountered only in advanced biology texts
and can be seen only in nature documentaries, all of them unique to the
ocean depths.
Frederick Grassle and Nancy Maciolek, well-known American marine ecologists,
say there may be 10 million species beneath the sea,67 and an astonishing
wealth of species several thousand meters beneath the surface, in an
environment previously believed to contain no life at all. Based on his
research, Grassle, Director of the Rutgers University Marine and Coastal
Research Institute, makes the following comment:
This sampling revealed that the deep-sea may, in fact, rival tropical
rainforests in terms of the numbers of species present. Thus the deep
sea may physically resemble a desert, but in terms of species composition,
it is more like a tropical rainforest. 68
In one study 1,500-2,500-m depth range off New Jersey and Delaware,
30 cm x 30 cm samples of sea water contained 798 species in 171 families
and 14 phyla.69 In another study performed off the coast of southern
Australia, more than 800 species were determined in 10 square meters
(11.96 square yards) of the sea floor.70
Yet a large part of the oceans have still not been the subject of scientific
research. Much of the bottom of the world's oceans are still unexplored
and unmapped.71 Therefore, every new investigation reveals some previously
unknown species.
One biological phenomenon discovered at the beginning
of the 21st century was that in the ocean floor's mud layer, certain
bacteria and archaeobacteria consume methane, and thus perform an activity
of vital importance to our lives. It is thought that these micro-organisms
consume devour 300 million tons of methane every year, about as much
as humans now inject into the atmosphere with agriculture, landfills,
and burning of fossil fuels.72 Therefore, as stated in Science magazine
of July 20, 2001, "These
methane-eating microbes—once thought to be impossible—now
look to be profoundly important to the planet's carbon cycle."73
Another striking fact is the flawless co-operation and order among the
bacteria in question, revealed only with this century's technology: Thanks
to archaeobacteria (which have a number of different structural features)
bacteria can feed on methane in an oxygen-free environment, because the
archaeobacteria in turn provide the oxygen that the bacteria need.
Research has demonstrated the astonishingly rich species diversity that exists several thousands of meters down in the oceans, where it was once believed that there was no life at all. |
These creatures, too small to be seen with the naked eye, live thousands
of meters down in the oceans in a layer of mud containing no oxygen,
where they work non-stop. What would happen if these single-celled organisms
disappeared? Their importance is crystal clear: Should these micro-organisms
vanish, then large quantities of methane gas ion in the sea bed would
enter the atmosphere. Global warning of mud due to the greenhouse effect
would occur. The climatic balance would be damaged all over the world,
and the Earth would become a planet too hot for us to live on.
In 2001, it was learned that certain species of bacteria live beneath
the ocean bed, in the Earth's crust.74 These organisms' natural habitat
lies up to 300 meters (985 feet) beneath the ocean floor, and thousands
of meters under the surface. The activities they carry out are equally
astonishing. These bacteria feed on rocks, and in doing so, perform another
task of the greatest importance to all living things, making a major
contribution to the flow of elements and chemical substances in the oceans.75 Note that these single-celled organisms do something, so important to
life on Earth, that even the entire world's laboratories and scientists
could not manage were they to join forces.
Another ecosystem on the ocean floor is found around hydrothermal vents,76 where superheated water containing various minerals emerges from cracks
in the Earth's crust. More than 300 unique species have so far been discovered
living in close proximity around these springs, which were discovered
only in the past 20 years.77 This environment is home to large tube worms
several meters in length and covered in bright red hairs, giant oysters,
mussels, squid and invertebrates with all kinds of different appearances.
Understandably, it has attracted great interest from researchers. In
the search to answer how these creatures find food, astonishing facts
have emerged.
Despite such adverse conditions as high pressure, low temperatures and scarce food resources, various animals, different-colored crustacean and micro-organisms thrive in the dark ocean depths. |
The tube worm found in the ecosystem around these
hydrothermal vents is very different from the other worms we are familiar
with: It has no mouth or digestive system! It meets its nutritional
needs thanks to the bacteria that live inside its tissues—a total
of 285 billion bacteria per ounce of tissue.78 These bacteria perform
chemosynthesis, transforming chemical substances that emerge from the
springs into nutrients, which the worms use to live.
The bacteria at the bottom of the ocean are the first link in the food
chain. Thanks to these micro-organisms, some invertebrates able to survive,
and some animals, such as the squid, survive thanks to these invertebrates.
The wealth of species and harmony among them, in an environment that
until recently was thought to contain no life at all, is truly amazing.
Also, it was recently established that various species are living near
the water leaks on the ocean floor, which are chemically rich but cold.
Each new study and development indicates how little we know about the
richness of the ocean bed.
Bear in mind that submarines used in deep-sea exploration were developed
only in the last 70 years. The exploring submarines that dive down thousands
of meters have been specially designed by experts from various fields.
Similarly, each species that has lived for millions of years at the bottoms
of the deepest oceans has also been created with a structure appropriate
to its hostile environment. Moreover, the mechanisms in these creatures'
cells are many times more complex than the systems in research submarines.
Structures so complex cannot, as evolution claims, have come into being
by chance. The variety of living things in the depths of the oceans,
and their superior characteristics, belong to God, the Creator of all
things.
Bacterial Ecology
When life is mentioned, plant and animal species generally
come to mind. Some people even imagine that life consists solely of
these. However, another living group which—despite being too small to be seen with
the naked eye—constitutes 25% to 50% of all living species on the
Earth: micro-organisms.79
Bacteria represent the most important portion of these micro-organisms.
These may be spherical, rod-like or spiral in shape. Most are smaller
than 0.001 millimeters (0.00003937 inch) in size, so small that hundreds
of thousands could fit into the period at the end of this sentence.80
Every ecosystem and all living species depend, either directly or indirectly,
on the activities of bacteria. (Their essential importance to the delicate
balances of life on Earth will be described in later sections.) They
can be found just about everywhere.81 Thousands of species of bacteria
exist in ice caps, hydrothermal vents, environments with high levels
of salinity or acid, amid chemical contaminants or pollutants, in the
organs and tissues of animals and human beings, in the depths of the
seas where there is little or no oxygen, and in the deep layers of the
Earth.
For example, the intestines of a healthy human being are an ecosystem
containing 400 different species of bacteria, organisms that play a very
important role in the regular functioning of the intestines.82
When the genetic structures of bacteria—which look identical to one another even under the microscope—were examined, it was realized that these actually constituted very different species. As the Northwestern University microbiologist David Stahl expressed it, these bacteria can be as different from one another as a brown bear is from an oak tree. |
Bacteria are part of a group that exhibits the greatest diversity among
living things. but about which the least is known.83 Their diversity
is far beyond the grasp of even 21st century technology. You could say
that a gram of soil containing thousands of species of bacteria and billions
of individuals resemble a rain forest at the microscopic level. In other
words, an extraordinary diversity similar to a rain forest's can also
be found in a handful of earth under the microscope.
To date, scientific studies aimed at determining bacteria and microbe
species are very much fewer than actually needed. It is difficult to
investigate these organisms for a number of reasons: Most species of
bacteria cannot be raised in the laboratory or in cultures, even though
a drop of sea water or tiny amount of soil contains billions of them.
Even the unbelievable wealth of bacteria species has been realized only
in recent years, with advances made in our knowledge of genetics.
When the genetic structures of microbes that appear
very similar even under the microscope were examined, they were found
to be actually very different species. In the words of the Northwestern
University microbiologist David Stahl, two microbes can be "as different from each other as a grizzly
bear from an oak tree."84
In his book In Search of Nature, Edward O. Wilson summarizes the latest
developments regarding these micro-organisms:
The true black hole of systematics, however, may be bacteria. Although
roughly 4,000 species have been formally described, recent studies in
Norway have indicated the presence of from 4,000 to 5,000 species, almost
all new to science, among the 10 billion individual organisms found on
average in each gram of forest soil, and another 4,000 to 5,000 species,
different from the first set and also mostly new, in an average gram
of nearby marine sediments.85
Another expert on the subject, Rita Colwell, former President of the
Maryland University Biotechnology Institute, gives the following figures
regarding the wealth of bacteria on Earth:

"Although
bacteria are tiny, they display biochemical, structural and behavioral
complexities that outstrip scientific description. In keeping with
the current microelectronics revolution, it may make more sense
to equate their size with sophistication rather than with simplicity...
Without bacteria, life on earth could not exist in its present
form." (James Shapiro) |
Only 3,000-4,000 species of bacteria have been described. It has been
estimated that there may be as many as 300,000 species of bacteria, but
more likely the number is closer to 3,000,000.86
Most of us think of bacteria as entities that merely cause disease.
Yet this is not correct. Only a small fraction of bacteria species are
agents of disease.87 As Andrew Pollack described in an article, bacteria
play an essential role in the formation and continuity of life on Earth
and in maintaining balances essential to life.88 This fact is set out
by Professor James Shapiro from the Chicago University Department of
Biochemistry and Molecular Biology:
Although bacteria are tiny, they display biochemical, structural and
behavioral complexities that outstrip scientific description. In keeping
with the current microelectronics revolution, it may make more sense
to equate their size with sophistication rather than with simplicity.
. . . Without bacteria, life on earth could not exist in its present
form.89
Although they multiply very rapidly and are so small and
numerous, bacteria act in such ways as to permit not the slightest confusion.
There is only one explanation: Every detail regarding bacteria, from
the exceedingly complex activities they perform (such as the photosynthesis
performed by cyanobacteria) to the numbers of their individuals and species,
is as wished and determined by God, Who created them. God knows and plans
where, when and in what numbers they need to be, and makes them a vehicle
in the regulation of the balances on Earth and in forming environments
suited to human life.
2 David Tilman, "Causes, consequences
and ethics of biodiversity", Nature, vol. 405, 11 May 2000, pp. 208-211.
3 Marjorie L. Reaka-Kudla, Don E. Wilson, Edward O. Wilson (editors), Biodiversity II: Understanding and Protecting Our Biological Resources, E.O. Wilson, "Introduction," p. 1, Washington D.C.: Joseph Henry Press, 1997.
4 Encyclopedia Britannica 2001 Deluxe Edition CD, "The importance of the biosphere."
5 Edward O. Wilson, In Search of Nature, Washington D.C. Island Press/ Shearwater Books, pp. 153-171. 
6 Marjorie L. Reaka-Kudla, Don E. Wilson, Edward O. Wilson (editors), Op cit.; Thomas E. Lovejoy, Biodiversity: What Is It?, Washington D.C.: Joseph Henry Press, 1996, p. 7.
7 Marjorie L. Reaka-Kudla, Don E. Wilson, Edward O. Wilson (editors), Op cit.; Q.D. Wheeler, J. Cracraft, Taxonomic Preparedness: Are We Ready to Meet the Biodiversity Challenge, Washington D.C.: Joseph Henry Press, 1996, p. 436.
8 Taylor H. Ricketts, "Conservation Biology and Biodiversity", Encyclopedia of Life Sciences, 2001, g.els.net.
9 Alessandro Minelli, "Diversity of Life", Encyclopedia of Life Sciences, 2001, g.els.net.
10 M. Encarta Encyclopedia 2001 Deluxe Edition CD, "Biodiversity."
11 Encyclopedia Britannica 2001 Deluxe Edition CD, "Evolution".
12 E.O. Wilson, "The Current State of Biological Diversity" in E.O. Wilson, F.M. Peter (editors), Biodiversity, Washington D.C.: National Academy Press, 1988, p. 14.
13 E.O. Wilson, "Introduction," in Marjorie L. Reaka-Kudla, Don E. Wilson, Edward O. Wilson (editors), Biodiversity II, Washington D.C.: Joseph Henry Press, 1997, p. 2.
14 Andy Purvis, Andy Hector, "Getting the measure of biodiversity," Nature, Vol. 405, 11 May 2000, pp. 213-214.
15 Taylor H. Ricketts, "Conservation Biology and Biodiversity", Encyclopedia of Life Sciences, 2001, g.els.net.
16 Alessandro Minelli, "Diversity of Life", Encyclopedia of Life Sciences, 2000, g.els.net.
17 N. Myers, R.A. Mittermeier, C.G. Mittermeier, G.A.B. Da Fonseca, J. Kent, "Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities," Nature, vol. 403, 24 February 2000, p. 853.
18 "Biodiversity", http://encarta.msn.com/encyclopedia_761579557/Biodiversity.html
19 Species 2000, Indexing the World's Known Species, http://www.sp2000.org.
20 Andrew Lawler, "Up for the Count?," Science, Vol. 294, 26 October 2001, p. 769; http://www.catalogueoflife.org/dynamic-checklist/info_about_sp2000.php
21 "What is IBOY?", http://www.nrel.colostate.edu/projects/iboy/index2.html#whatbiodiv.
22 "Scientists Launch The International Biodiversity Observation Year (IBOY) To Raise Awareness Of Biodiversity", Science Daily Magazine, 2001, http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2001/01/010103072716.htm 
23 All Species Foundation, http://www.all-species.org/
24 Andrew Lawler, "Up for the Count?", Science, Vol. 294, 26 October 2001, p. 769.
25 E.O. Wilson, "Introduction", p. 2, Marjorie L. Reaka-Kudla, Don E. Wilson, Edward O. Wilson (editors), Biodiversity II, Joseph Henry Press, Washington D.C., 1997.
26 Peter H. Raven, "Our Diminishing Tropical Forests," p. 120, E.O. Wilson, F.M. Peter (editors), Biodiversity, Washington D.C.: National Academy Press, 1988.
27 Alessandro Minelli, "Diversity of Life", Encyclopedia of Life Sciences, 2000, g.els.net
28 Skeletons In The Closet: One Fifth of Species Names May Be Invalid", Science Daily Magazine, 14/11/2001, http://wwwsciencedaily.com/releases/2001/11/011114071056.htm.
29 How Many Species Are There?", World Resources Institute, 2001, http://biodiv.wri.org/pubs_content_text.cfm?ContentID=535 
30 Norman Myers, "The Rich Diversity of Biodiversity Issues," in Marjorie L. Reaka-Kudla, Don E. Wilson, Edward O. Wilson (editors), Biodiversity II, Washington D.C. Joseph Henry Press, 1997, p. 125.
31 Nigel E. Stork, "Measuring Global Biodiversity and Its Decline," in Marjorie L. Reaka-Kudla, Don E. Wilson, Edward O. Wilson (editors), Biodiversity II, Washington D.C.,: Joseph Henry Press 1997, pp. 41, 61.
32 Ayse Turak, "Dogaya Sicak Bakmak," Bilim ve Teknik ("Science and Technique"), December 2000, p. 63
33 National Geographic, http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2000/12/1201_russianlake.html, December 1, 2000.
34 http://library.thinkquest.org/25014/what/decline.impact.html 
35 Edward O. Wilson, In Search of Nature, pp. 197-198.
36 John Whitfield, "All Creatures Great and Small," Nature, Vol. 413, 27 September 2001, p. 344.
37 "Biosphere 2 Center," Columbia University, 2002, http://www.bio2.edu/
38 Joel E. Cohen, David Tilman, "Biosphere 2 and Biodiversity—The Lessons So Far", Science, Vol. 274, No. 5290, 15 November 1996, p. 1150-1151.
39 G.C. Daily, S. Alexander, P.R. Ehrlich, L. Goulder, J. Lubchenco, P.A. Matson, H.A. Mooney, S. Postel, S.H. Schneider, D. Tilman, and G.M. Woodwell, "Ecosystem Services: Benefits Supplied to Human Societies by Natural Ecosystems," 2002, http://www.esa.org/science/Issues/TextIssues/issue2.php.
40 Joel E. Cohen, David Tilman, Op.cit., p. 1151. 
41 Thomas E. Lovejoy, "Biodiversity: What Is It?," in Marjorie L. Reaka-Kudla,
Don E. Wilson, Edward O. Wilson (editors), Biodiversity II, Joseph Henry Press,
Washington D.C., 1997, p. 8,
42 M. Encarta Encyclopedia 2001 Deluxe Edition CD, "Rain
Forest."
43 Ibid., "Amazonian Biodiversity."
44 E.O. Wilson, "The Current State of Biological
Diversity," in E.O. Wilson,
F.M. Peter (editors), Biodiversity, Washington D.C.: National Academy Press,
1988, p. 9,.
45 Çağlar Sunay, "Yitirilmekte Olan Cennet Amazon" (The
Amazon), Bilim ve Teknik , April 1999, p. 75.
46 "Terrestrial Arthropod Biodiversity
: Planning a Study and Recommended Sampling Techniques," a Brief Prepared by
the Biological Survey of Canada, (Terrestrial Arthropods) 1994., http://www.biology.ualberta.ca/bsc/briefs/brterrestrial.htm
47
Terry L. Erwin, "Biodiversity at its Utmost: Tropical Forest Beetles," in
, Marjorie L. Reaka-Kudla, Don E. Wilson, Edward O. Wilson (editors), Biodiversity
II, Washington D.C.: Joseph Henry Press, 1997, p. 27.
48 Encyclopedia Britannica
2001 Deluxe Edition CD, "Environment, Tropical
Forest".
49 Edward O. Wilson, In Search of Nature, p. 143
50 Çağlar Sunay,
Op cit., p. 75.
51 M. Encarta Encyclopedia 2001 Deluxe Edition CD, "Rain Forest."
52 D.H. Janzen, "How
to be a Fig," Annual Review. Ecology Systemat., Vol.
10, 1979, p. 13.
53 M. Encarta Encyclopedia 2001 Deluxe Edition CD, "Butterflies
and Moths."
54 Virginia Morell, "On the Origin of (Amazonian) Species," Discover,
April 1997.
55 Douglas H. Chadwick, "Kingdom of Coral," National Geographic,
2002, http://www.nationalgeographic.com/ngm/0101/feature2/index.html
56 M.L.
Reaka-Kudla, "The Global Biodiversity of Coral Reefs: A Comparison
With Rain Forests," in Marjorie L. Reaka-Kudla, Don E. Wilson, Edward O. Wilson
(editors), pp. 94, 102,.
57 Sarah Graham, "Scientists Explain How Corals Thrive
in Nutrient-Poor Waters," Scientific
American, 18 October 2001, http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?articleID=000A8B4C-F12F-1C63-B882809EC588ED9F
58
C. Darwin, The Structure and Distribution of Coral Reefs, London: Smith, Elder & Company,
1842.
59 C. Richter, M. Wunsch, M. Rasheed, I. Kötter, M.I. Badran, "Endoscopic
exploration of Red Sea coral reefs reveals dense populations of cavity-dwelling
sponges," Nature, Vol. 413, 18 October 2001, pp. 726-730.
60 Douglas H. Chadwick, "Coral
in Peril," National Geographic, January 1999,
pp. 30-37.
61 Justin Marshall, "Why are Reef Fish So Colorful?," Scientific
American: The Oceans, August 1998.
62 Ibid.
63 Ayşegül Yılmaz Günenç, "Mercan Kayalıklarında," Bilim
ve Teknik, October 1999, p. 82.
64 Ibid.
65 Justin Marshall, Op cit., Scientific American, August 1998.
66 Carl Zimmer,
Evolution: The Triumph of an Idea. New York: HarperCollins. p. 235.
67 J.F.
Grassle, N.J. Maciolek, "Deep-Sea Species Richness: Regional and Local
Diversity Estimates From Quantitative Bottom Samples", American Naturalist,
vol. 139, 1992, p. 313-341.
68 Marcia Collie, Julie Russo, "Deep-Sea Biodiversity and the Impacts of Ocean
Dumping", 2000, http://www.research.noaa.gov/spotlite/archive/spot_oceandumping.html
69
.F. Grassle, N.J. Maciolek, "Deep-Sea Species Richness: Regional and Local
Diversity Estimates from Quantitative Bottom Samples," American Naturalist,
Vol. 139, No. 2, February 1992, pp. 313-341.
70 G.C.B. Poore, G.D.F. Wilson, "Marine
Species Richness," Nature, Vol. 361,
1993, p. 579.
71 "Ocean", http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ocean 
72 Raşit Gürdilek, "Dünyayı Kurtaran
Mikroplar" Bilim
ve Teknik, September 2001, p. 10.
73 Carl Zimmer, "Inconceivable Bugs Eat Methane
on the Ocean Floor," Science,
Vol. 293, 20 July 2001, pp. 418-419.
74 David Whitehouse, "The Microbes That
Rule the World," BBC News Online,
28 September 2001, http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/sci/tech/newsid_1569000/1569264.stm
75 "Researchers
Find Glass-Eating Microbes at the Rock Bottom of the Food Chain," Scripps Institution
of Oceanography, 2001, http://www.spaceref.com/news/viewpr.html?pid=6137
76
Francesco Canganella, "Hydrothermal Vent Communities," Encyclopedia of
Life Sciences, 2000, ğ.els.net.
77 "Sea Connections", Smithsonian Center
for Education and Museum Studies, 2001, http://www.smithsonianeducation.org/educators/lesson_plans/ocean/connect/essay.html 
78 Ibid.
79 Richard O. Roblin, "Resources for Biodiversity in Living Collections
and the Challenges of Assessing Microbial Biodiversity," in Biodiversity II
p. 467.
80 M. Encarta Encyclopedia, 2001 Deluxe Edition CD, "Bacteria."
81 Bacteria
and Their Effects on Ground-Water Quality, http://mi.water.usgs.gov/h2oqual/GWBactHOWeb.html
82
The Intestinal System, http://www.webnat.com/educ/clIntestinalSystem.asp
83
Robert F. Service, "Microbiologists Explore Life's Rich, Hidden Kingdoms," Science,
Vol. 275, Number 5307, 21 March 1997, pp. 1740-1750.
84 Ibid.
85 Edward O. Wilson, In Search of Nature, p.171.
86 R.R. Colwell, "Microbial
Biodiversity and Biotechnology,", Biodiversity
II, p. 282.
87 M. Encarta Encyclopedia, 2001 Deluxe Edition CD, "Bacteria."
88 Andrew Pollack, "A
New Kind of Genomics, With an Eye on Ecosystems," The
New York Times, October 21, 2003.
89 James A. Shapiro, "Bacteria as Multicellular
Organisms," Scientific American,
June 1988, p. 82. |